One of the most common deckbuilding mistakes in TCG/LCGs that new
players make is playing too many cards. Constructed
Magic formats have a minimum deck size of 60 cards, and as a result 99.99% of
all good Magic decks play exactly 60 cards.
New players often struggle with this, with lots of cards they want to
play in their deck for specific circumstances, and lacking the discipline to
cut their deck down to the bare minimum.
It’s not a crime to play 65 cards but if you’re trying to be serious
about your chances of winning you’re only making them worse by going over the
minimum – it reduces the chances of seeing your best cards, and increases the
chances of seeing cards that shouldn’t really be in your deck to begin with.
60 cards? You folks ain't from round here, are ya?
The minimum deck size rule holds true in almost any TCG or
LCG, but it’s one of the many sacred cows of TCG strategy that doesn’t apply in
Android: Netrunner. Specifically, the Corp has a really good
reason for wanting to play more than the minimum cards because it allows him to
spread his Agenda cards more thinly through his R&D. Playing 49 cards (the most you’re allowed to
play with only 20-21 Agenda points in your deck) makes it less likely that you’ll
draw a clump of Agendas at once that stock up in HQ, and also makes it less
likely that the Runner will hit an Agenda if they run the top card of R&D.
For a long time 49 cards has been the accepted staple size
of competitive Corp decks, as decreasing the percentage of Agendas in R&D has
been a desirable strategy. There is a
growing argument now, however, for Corp decks to return to their minimum 45 cards specifically to INCREASE their Agenda density.
Two factors are merging that encourage this trend:
1) The rise of Runner decks using Medium and
R&D Interface means that mid-game the thin Agenda density does a lot less
to protect you from the Runner scoring Agenda points off the top of
R&D. In many cases a thin Agenda
density actually works AGAINST the Corporation because the Runner becomes
better at seeing cards in R&D than the Corp is! In the lategame it can be very difficult for
the Corporation to see new cards out of R&D without the Runner having
already accessed them. Playing fewer
Agendas still slows down the rate at which you’re losing, but by making the game
longer you often play further and further into the Runner’s hands.
2) One of the best ways to combat the late-game
power of current strategies likes the R&D Interface or Atman-Datasucker
combination is to prevent the game actually getting into the late game by
winning early. To win early you need to
draw Agendas, and to draw Agendas you need to increase your Agenda density.
More and
more, the Corp’s late game tricks for scoring an Agenda are being devalued by
not being given an Agenda to score – keeping Agendas thin in your deck just
prolongs the inevitable moment when the Runner steals them from R&D.
This anecdote comes from Magic: The Gathering. A friend of mine was playing in a tournament
and he was winning his match but his opponent kept playing spells that gained
him a lot of Life points and my friend was struggling to actually chase his
opponent down and finish the match. We
had long since finished our games and went over to watch the end of his match,
which our friend eventually (and inevitably) won. He breathed a huge sigh of relief at having
won what he considered a tough game, but we were of a different opinion…
“That was tough”
“What? His deck was
rubbish. All he ever did was gain life.”
“True, but look how
long it took me to kill him”
Look. How long. It took me. To kill him.
That’s a very telling phrase, the most
important part of which is that our friend did eventually kill his
opponent. In fact with each lifegain
spell his opponent played our friend’s chance of winning the game actually
increased, because it was another spell that did nothing to actually change the
game. By gaining lots of life his
opponent had ensured that a short game he could
win turned into a long game he couldn’t.
=======
“Look how long it took me to kill him” has become a bit of a
catchphrase among my Magic friends for the futility of playing cards that only
prolong your defeat, and it’s kind of the way I feel about some Corp decks that
run 49 cards.
Don’t get me wrong, for a lot of Corp decks 49 cards is
still right. If you’re not trying to
score 7 Agenda points quickly then 49 cards is probably the right call. If you’re trying to set up a
Midseasons/Psychographics combo with Project Beale; play 49 cards. If you’re trying to win a long game of
economic attrition with cards like Gila Hands Arcology and Archer; play 49
cards. But more and more the best play
for a Corp under pressure from Atman-Datasucker is to get the game over with
ASAP, and that requires seeing Agendas. Yes, sometimes you risk drawing too many Agenda in the early game but that's the counterbalance to the risk of NOT seeing them in the late game, and in a deck with a lot of cheap End the Run ICE you have a good chance of scoring those Agendas in hand before the Runner has even finished breakfast.
 |
| How many Agendas is TOO many? |
Both my current Corp decks are 45 cards, and the NBN
identity “The World is Yours”, which has a minimum deck size of just 40 cards, has recently been creeping up the win percentages on Octgn (as you can read about HERE), powered partly by
the excellent Jackson Howard. We aren’t seeing
the end of the 49 card decks just yet but I believe we are in a period where
there is now a legitimate decision to make between the two strategies and the
two deck sizes. If you’re trying to be
quick, which is a good tactic these days, then 45 cards may well be your best
option.
